/ Musicologized | Page 6 of 21 Forensic Musicologist Services
tel: 212.217.9512

AI and Copyright are natural frenemies.

tel: 212.217.9512

AI and Copyright are natural frenemies.

Last month the US Copyright Office hosted hours of listening sessions online in which various players discussed hopes and concerns around copyright and generative AI. When Ghostwriter977 released “Heart On My Sleeve,” it was our wakeup call, similar in some ways to that week back in December when we all found out about ChatGPT and …

Read more

Although Bad Bunny is just one of about a gazillion named defendants, his recent motion to dismiss might spell the end of this entire “Fish Market” vs Reggaeton fiasco. And it could actually do a ton of good for music copyright in general. Fisaco might not quite tell it. If I were to post a …

Read more

As pretty much everyone knows, Ed Sheeran was found not to have copied “Let’s Get It On” in creating “Thinking Out Loud.” More specifically, the first of several questions on the jury form was, “Did Sheeran establish… that he independently created Thinking Out Loud…?” to which the jury answered yes, and put down their pencils. …

Read more

Influence is not infringement. Nor is it copying. Nor should artists need to pretend they’re influenced by nobody, lest they get sued. When the Jonas Brothers say they’re influenced by the records that played in their house growing up, let them. And when you think you hear those bands in “The Album” (that’s what they …

Read more

Copyright has seen this movie before, a new technology comes along that lowers the barriers to getting stuff for free, and rightsholders, not unreasonably, panic. And then, they litigate, like “dinosaurs suing to prevent the ice age,” as I’ve heard it put. But the tech always wins, pretty much. My first instinct is to take …

Read more

Not quite two weeks after Ed Sheeran was found not to have copied Marvin Gaye’s “Let’s Get It On,” the same judge, yesterday, dismissed a second case with a different plaintiff, Structured Asset Sales, which owns a stake in “Let’s Get It On” as well. “Let’s Get It On” v. “Thinking Out Loud” is the …

Read more

The main takeaway from the Ed Sheeran “Thinking Out Loud” vs “Let’s Get It On” case is probably, “Why did this make it all the way to trial?” First, though, let’s remind ourselves we could be in far worse places. “Not liable” was the right verdict. We’re not now left picking up the broken vestiges …

Read more

It’s worth discussing, “Why would Ed Sheeran copy “Let’s Get It On’s” chord progression?” Why would Ed Sheeran copy “Let’s Get It On’s” chord progression? If there’s one thing that thirty years of “Law and Order” can teach us, it’s to consider motive along with the evidence when trying to establish someone committed wrongdoing. There’s the exception …

Read more

The Ed Sheeran “Thinking Out Loud” v “Let’s Get It On” trial is really about just a couple of things, a video of him segueing from “Thinking” to “Let’s” in concert, called a “smoking gun” and tantamount to “a confession” by Ben Crump, and the musicologically important part, the accompaniment that the plaintiff believes Sheeran could not have …

Read more

It all comes down to Thing 1 and Thing 2, both easily explained in under three minutes. Ed Sheeran is headed to court next week to defend against the claim that he copied Marvin Gaye and Ed Townsend’s “Let’s Get It On” when he wrote “Thinking Out Loud.” My opinion (not one bit iffy on …

Read more
Page 6 of 21« First...456781020...Last »