As a music plagiarism expert, I evaluate whether similarities between two works reflect independent creation, common musical practice, or unlawful copying. Attorneys, composers, and publishers engage Musicologize for impartial analysis that distinguishes coincidence from plagiarism — and translates those findings into clear, actionable opinions.
Unlike copyright infringement (a legal standard), plagiarism is often a reputational and commercial issue. My role is to provide clarity early, so clients can assess risk and respond strategically.
Musicologize also provides music copyright expert witness services, music infringement expert witness, and song similarity analysis. These pages interlink to provide comprehensive coverage of plagiarism, infringement, and copyright disputes.
Q: What is the difference between plagiarism and infringement?
Plagiarism is a reputational or ethical issue; infringement is a legal one. Both can harm careers and businesses, and both benefit from independent analysis.
Q: How fast can I get a plagiarism evaluation?
I provide preliminary reads in 24–72 hours, with detailed written opinions if needed.
Q: Are plagiarism opinions admissible in court?
Yes. While plagiarism claims often resolve outside of court, my opinions are formatted for litigation when necessary.
Q: Do you offer preventative reviews?
Yes — I frequently review tracks and advertising placements before release to mitigate risk.
Q: Do you work for both plaintiffs and defendants?
Yes. Impartiality is essential for credibility in plagiarism disputes.
Book a 15-Minute Consult
📧 brianmcbrearty@gmail.com
📞 (212) 217-9512
